THE DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR PRANAHITA-CHEVELLA SUJALA SRAVANTHI PROJECT ON GODAVARI
Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan (left), Union Water Resources Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal and A.P. Chief Minister N. Kiran Kumar Reddy in New Delhi
Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Kiran Kumar Reddy and his Maharashtra counterpart, Prithviraj Chavan, signed an agreement in the presence of Union Water Resources Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal on Rs.40,300-crore Pranahita-Chevella irrigation project that will serve both States.
The Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Pranahita-Chevella Sujala Sravanthi project, which Andhra Pradesh wants to be declared as a national project, envisages diversion of 160 tmc of water by constructing a barrage across the Pranahita river, which is a major tributary of the Godavari.
It further utilises 20 tmc of water from the Godavari at the Sripada Yellampally project.
A joint inter-State committee will be formed to ensure efficient, speedy and economical investigation and execution of the project. To prevent any differences between A.P. and Maharashtra over the project, the joint committee will decide on the location of the barrage and the share of the expenditure involved for the two States.
Mr. Pawan Kumar Bansal Water resources minister termed the agreement a “trendsetter” and hoped other States would follow suit in the inter-State water disputes. Mr. Reddy described the agreement as “historic,” as the project would lift water upto 1256 metres and be a “lifeline” for both States, particularly by the districts of the backward Telangana region where Water from the basin will be utilised for drinking, irrigation and industrial requirements including the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad (30 tmc).
As per the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal (GWDT) report, dated October 6, 1975, Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh have agreed to take up the Lendi Project, the Lower Penganga and the Pranahita-Chevella at an appropriate time with agreed water utilisation. The Lower Penganga and Lendi Projects are already under execution.
For the inter-State board, the Chief Ministers of the two States will be chairman/co-chairman on rotation and its members include the Ministers and the Secretaries of Irrigation, Power, Finance, Revenue, Forest departments (both States).
Bhabhli dam constructed b y Maharashtra is a concern for AP as it falls in the catchment area of SRIRAMSAGAR PROJECT thus has the potential to reduce the water flows into it..
Supreme court’s judgement allows further construction of the Bhabhli dam if Maharashtra does not claim any damages after the final judgement of SC. Further the sluice gates must not be constructed...
Polavaram dam as decided in the 1975 Bachawat Tribunal award has been started but faces many challenges..
Interstate conflict: Orissa and Chattisgarh’s land submergence is a concern
Interregional: Two regions Telangana and Coastal Andhra Pradesh in AP are contending that the dam is beneficial for the later while the former will face submergence.
Ecological conflict: Large tracts of land in Khammam district of AP is covered with pristine forests, part of Dandakaranya Forest, which will get submerged hence ecologists/environmentalists oppose this dam tooth and nail.
Rehab/Resettlement will be another area of concern due to the large tribal population which usually is dependent on the forest produce.
KRISHNA RIVER WATERS DISPUTE TRIBUNAL KWDT II
The Chairman of Krishna River Water Dispute Tribunal Mr.Brijesh Kumar who pronounced today his judgement in New Delhi passed an order distributing 1001 TMC s Krishna River water to Andhra Pradesh state, 666 TMCs Krishna river water for Maharastra State and 911 TMCs river water for Karanataka state in South India.
The Chairman of the Tribunal also ordered that all the three states must give 7 TMCs water equally for Tamilnadu state in first three months of every year. And rights on usage of rest of the entire suprplus water of Krishna River is given to Andhra Pradesh. And Karnataka state is favoured by permitting it to raise the Almatti Dam to the extent of 524.24 meters, which the Andhra Pradesh State is considering as disastrous for the on going seven Irrigation projects in the Andhra Pradesh and also a set back for water flow to Nagarjuna Sagar and Srisailam Dams in the state. In general the political parties in the Andhra Pradesh are not happy over the Tribunal Judgement, as the Judgement of the Tribunal can be Reviewed only after May 2050
The Telugu Ganga project is a water supply scheme implemented in South India, to provide drinking water to Chennai city in Tamil Nadu. It is also known as the Krishna Water Supply Project, since the source of the water is the Krishna river in Andhra Pradesh. Water is drawn from the Srisailam reservoir and diverted towards Chennai through a series of inter-linked canals, over a distance of about 406 km, before it reaches the destination at the Poondi reservoir near Chennai.
The project was approved in 1977 after an agreement was reached between Tamil Nadu and the riparian states of Krishna river: Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh. According to the agreement, each of the three riparian states were to contribute 5 thousand million cubic ft (tmc)or 5,000,000,000 cubic feet (140,000,000 m3) of water annually, for a total supply of 15 tmc. This number was revised down to 12 tmc in 1983.
The water initially supplied by the canal was disappointing, delivering less than 0.5 tmc.
In 2002 religious leader Sathya Sai Baba announced a great scheme of restoration and lining of the canal; a private undertaking. With an extensive rebuilding of the canal and several reservoirs, the project was completed in 2004, when Poondi reservoir received Krishna water for the first time. The supply of water to Chennai city in 2006 was 3.7 tmc. After the re-lining and reconstruction, the Kandaleru-Poondi part of the canal was renamed Sai Ganga
KAVERI RIVER WATER DISPUTE
The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal announced its final verdict on 5 February 2007. According to its verdict.
Tamil Nadu gets 419 billion ft³ (12 km³) of Cauvery water while
Karnataka gets 270 billion ft³ (7.6 km³).
The actual release of water by Karnataka to Tamil Nadu is to be 192 billion ft³ (5.4 km³) annually.
Further, Kerala will get 30 billion ft³ and
Pondicherry 7 billion ft³. Tamil Nadu appears to have been accepting the verdict while the government of Karnataka, unhappy with the decision, filed a revision petition before the tribunal seeking a review
The Mullaperiyar Dam is a masonry gravity dam on the Periyar River in the Kerala state of India. It is located 881 m (2,890 ft) above mean sea level on the Cardamom Hills of the Western Ghats in Thekkady, Idukki District of Kerala, South India. It was constructed between 1887 and 1895 by the British Government to divert water eastwards to Madras Presidency area (the present-day Tamil Nadu). It has a height of 53.6 m (176 ft) from the foundation and length of 365.7 m (1,200 ft). The Periyar National Park in Thekkady is located around the dam's reservoir. The dam is located in Kerala on the river Periyar, but the dam is controlled and operated under a period lease by neighbouring Tamil Nadu state. The control and safety of the dam and the validity and fairness of the lease agreement have been points of dispute between Kerala and Tamil Nadu states. Supreme court judgment came in February 27 2006, allowing Tamil Nadu to raise the level of the dam to 152 feet after strengthening it. Responding to it, Mullaperiyar dam was declared an 'endangered' scheduled dam by the Kerala Government under the disputed Kerala Irrigation and Water Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2006. Provisions in this act bypasses supreme court judgment and it prescribes the level of water in the 22 dams, Mullaperiyar is in the top of the list.
NETRAVATI RIVER CONTROVERSY
Netravati river flows south of Mangalore but was proposed to be shifted northwards for agri and commercial purposes but environmentalists content that the shifting of the waters of the river will damage the present Ecosystem consisting of flora and fauna which will have short supply of waters.
INLAND WATERWAYS OF INDIA
Allahabad–Haldia stretch of the Ganges–Bhagirathi–Hooghly river system.
Estd = October 1986. Length = 1620 km§
National Waterway 2 Sadiya — Dhubri stretch of Brahmaputra river.
Estd = September 1982. Length = 891 km
Kottapuram-Kollam stretch of the West Coast Canal, Champakara Canal and Udyogmandal Canal. Estd = February 1993 Length = 205 km
Kakinada–Pondicherry stretch of Canals and the Kaluvelly Tank, Bhadrachalam – Rajahmundry stretch of River Godavari and Wazirabad – Vijayawada stretch of River Krishna. Estd = November 2008 Length = 1095 km
Established = November 2008 Length = 623 km
National Waterway 6 *Lakhipur to Bhanga of river Barak. Proposed Length = 121 km
India has an extensive network of inland waterways in the form of rivers, canals, backwaters and creeks. The total navigable length is 14,500 km, out of which about 5200 km of river and 4000 km of canals can be used by mechanised crafts. Freight transportation by waterways is highly underutilised in India compared to other large countries and geographic areas like the United States, China and the European Union. The total cargo moved (in tonne kilometers) by the inland waterway was just 0.1% of the total inland traffic in India, compared to the 21% figure for United States. Cargo transportation in an organised manner is confined to a few waterways in Goa, West Bengal, Assam and Kerala. Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) is the statutory authority in charge of the waterways in India. Its headquarters is located in NOIDA (UP). It does the function of building the necessary infrastructure in these waterways, surveying the economic feasibility of new projects and also administration and regulation.
Supreme Court of India, before giving any instructions to Union Government on the INTER LINKING OF RIVERS, wanted to know the cost factor of the entire project and the financial burden on Govt...
The river interlinking project was the brainchild of the NDA government and in October 2002, the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had formed a task force to get the project going against the backdrop of the acute drought that year.
The task force had submitted a report recommending division of the project into two —— the Peninsular component and the Himalayan component.
The Peninsular component —— involving the rivers in southern India —— envisaged developing a ‘Southern Water Grid’ with 16 linkages. This component included diversion of the surplus waters of the Mahanadi and Godavari to the Pennar, Krishna, Vaigai and Cauvery.
The task force had also mooted:
the diversion of the west-flowing rivers of Kerala and Karnataka to the east,
the interlinking of small rivers that flow along the west coast, south of Tapi and north of Mumbai and
interlinking of the southern tributaries of the river Yamuna.
The Himalayan component envisaged building storage reservoirs on the Ganga and the Brahmaputra and their main tributaries both in India and Nepal in order to conserve the waters during the monsoon for irrigation and generation of hydro-power, besides checking flood
The total project cost was estimated at 5.6 Lakh Crores and UPA – II has shelved the project and Mr Jairam Ramesh then Minister of Envi and Forests had dubbed it a Social, Ecological and Financial Disaster.